Professor Kan Kaili thrown out of the "firmly against the abolition of fixed monthly fee," once again trouble the communication sector of the uproar. Supporters have the votes even more.
As for the support or rejection of reason, the parties are tempted to argue. But I am concerned, I do not receive the current practice of fixed phone bill. I recall that in seven or eight years ago, in my home fixed the upfront connection fees (donated a telephone) one or two thousand dollars, when compared to the standard of living, the price is rather high.
If the cost does not include the user's network construction and maintenance costs, then such a high upfront with what to do? Turn a thought, at that time the country's phone has not a large area, operators need to expand fixed line networks, such a high cost is probably the construction of the operator network to support it in disguise, as the case, it is to use previous money for those services later. Here, operators themselves beneficiaries.
With the "Every Village Project" the deepening of China's fixed line penetration levels have been greatly improved. Now been canceled in some areas of upfront connection fees, no cancellation where the cost is greatly reduced. Required to pay monthly fees at this time, as is understandable. But there is a question, and the current fixed pricing mechanism in China mainly by call time to count, then the fee per unit of time how is calculated? Who can guarantee that the cost of which did not take up network resources and the maintenance costs included.
Indeed, if cancel the installation fee and monthly fee, do not rule out a number of telephone subscribers for fixed line operators, ARPU contribution to the value of almost zero (such as home telephone number of the elderly will only be used as an answer), which is for social communication resources a waste. Here, I think, "Communication World" as a compromise president Li Gang key idea seemed like a solution: charge the appropriate monthly fee, but you can hit several times by allowing free calls a month to be a balance. Of course, how close, how much charge, free caller number and frequency of such decisions are a problem.
It appears that this "fixed monthly fee," the war will go on endless stalemate.
Finally, would like to say one thing: Whatever it is, everyone has their own point of view, the so-called benevolent see benevolence and the wise see wisdom. Present their own point of view, his own reason, only to better and to share. Unfortunately, there are a lot of "Network blood person", for those who receive fixed monthly fee to support groups of people wantonly attacked the conduct of life. As a general consumer, want to cancel the monthly charge for the urgent requirement of course understandable. But in the end can be achieved, should eventually be attributed to technology and practice of exploration, not curse can be resolved.
Thus, the impression is "bred", and nothing more.
Recommended links:
OSPF Posts: Frame Relay OSPF-radio host
Thunder's Humor: The Content Of Our Nearly 100% Genuine
Photoshop beauty oily skin making ideas
wmv PS3
Dell notebook case for the core trial Xiamen
Photoshop font effects - Ice text
Catalogs Security And Privacy:
Thief 3 of original experiences
archos mkv
Dynamic change CBA button
Matroska video file
Easy to use Food And Drink
Ps3 ogm
Input text input is also on the all-powerful plug
Bonus of Sight [2]
